This black and white header is for the print version of the page
Quick finder : Snapshot :
Theme
 
Sub-theme
 
Indicator
Analysis
 

 

Source Office for National Statistics / Local Knowledge
Date Released July 2009
National Indicators N/A
Hampshire LAA targets N/A
Date range 1996 - 2006

Commentary

The level of Gross Value Added (GVA) can provide an indication of the level of productivity. GVA indicates the extent and value of economic activity by measuring the production of goods and services and the contribution to the economy of each individual producer, industry or sector in the United Kingdom.

GVA measures the contribution to the economy of each individual producer, industry or sector in the UK.  GVA is used in the estimation of Gross Domestic Product (GDP).  The link between GVA and GDP can be defined as: GVA (at current basic prices) plus taxes on products less subsidies on products = GDP. In summary, GVA + taxes on products - subsidies on products = GDP.  

Increase of GVA features in the South East of England Development Agency (SEEDA) Regional Economic Strategy 2006-2016.  Two of the three RES headline targets:  

  • to achieve an annual average increase in Gross Value Added per capita of at least 3%, and 
  • to increase productivity per worker by an average of 2.4% annually.  

The Regional Economic Strategy for the South East can be found on the SEEDA website at:
http://www.seeda.org.uk/RES_for_the_South_East_2006-2016/RES_2006-2016/

Within the RES, eight Diamond for Investment and Growth Areas are designated.  These areas are identified as having the greatest potential for significant contributions to economic growth and sustainable prosperity in the South East region. One of the three strategic objectives for the Diamond Areas is for the Diamonds to collectively aim to generate 45% of the South East`s GVA growth to 2016.  More information can be found at: 
http://www.southeastdiamonds.org.uk/ 
  

Confidence Levels

GVA is officially calculated by the Office for National Statistics at national (UK and England), regional, and Unitary level. ONS do not produce a local authority district level equivalent. 

The GVA indicator from Local Knowledge is modelled on workplace based earnings from ASHE, based on a weekly earnings index that is applied to each local authority earnings level.  Care must be taken when interpreting the data at district level.  Headline results, from which the data below is taken, is calculated using a five year moving average. This is calculated to reduce year on year volatility caused by sampling in the data sources.  

Data

The latest data for Basingstoke and Deane (2006) shows the level of GVA locally exceeds county and national averages and is similar to the South East average.

Gross Value Added per capita 2006

Basingstoke and Deane

Hampshire CC

South East

England

UK

21,273.4

18,568.0

20,152.0

19,413.0

19,430.0

Time Series

As GVA is a new analysis for the Profile Online, compilation of a time series analysis will commence with the latest data available.  At present, comparable data is available for 2006 and 2005 as shown below.

Gross Value Added per capita

2005

2006

Basingstoke and Deane

21,822.3

21,273.4

Hampshire CC

17,811.0

18,568.0

South East

19,434.0

20,152.0

England

18,267.0

19,413.0

UK

18,205.0

19,430.0

Comparisons

Within the South East there are two natural comparator groups of local authorities with whom Basingstoke and Deane could compare. Analysis of the borough`s position with respect to the Western Corridor and Blackwater Valley, and the borough`s nearest geographical neighbours, can be seen below.  It should be remembered that, at district level, GVA data as given by Local Knowledge will also be influenced by average earnings of people who work within each local authority area.   Those areas with higher workplace based earnings levels are likely to have increased estimates of GVA.

Gross Value Added per capita 2006
(Source: Local Knowledge)

Western Corridor & Blackwater Valley authorities and all Hampshire

Windsor and Maidenhead

44389.88

West Berkshire

38363.29

Wokingham

37772.33

Bracknell Forest

34300.43

Reading

31721.13

Guildford

30371.51

Wycombe

29748.32

Surrey Heath

28058.30

Hart

24383.20

East Hampshire

21705.21

Winchester

21625.97

Basingstoke and Deane

21273.40

Eastleigh

20215.67

South East

20152.00

UK

19430.00

England

19413.00

Test Valley

18884.60

Hampshire CC

18568.00

Fareham

18516.18

New Forest

17989.29

Southampton

17986.12

Rushmoor

17898.18

Portsmouth

17852.94

Havant

17351.49

Gosport

16186.80


Secondly, it can be helpful to set the borough in context with the Diamond for Growth authority areas.  Again the same caveats apply when comparing one local authority area to another.  

Gross Value Added per capita 2006
(Source: Local Knowledge)
Diamonds for Growth

Diamond area

local authorities within Diamond

2006

Basingstoke and Deane Basingstoke and Deane

21273.4

Partnership for Urban South Hampshire (PUSH) East Hampshire

21705.21

Eastleigh

20215.67

Fareham

18516.18

Gosport

16186.8

Havant

17351.49

New Forest

17989.29

Portsmouth

17852.94

Southampton

17986.12

Test Valley

18884.6

Winchester

21625.97

Brighton & Hove Brighton & Hove

20025.18

Thames Gateway/Kent Medway Towns

12609.11

Gravesham

15385.54

Swale

15055.25

Dartford

16743.79

Gatwick Crawley

19234.78

Horsham

24295.69

Lewes

15668.51

Mid Sussex

22504.4

Mole Valley

28881.73

Reigate and Banstead

29162.55

Tandridge

28210.61

Reading Reading

31721.13

Wokingham

37772.33

West Berkshire

38363.29

Central Oxfordshire Cherwell

24640.14

Oxford

23330.56

South Oxfordshire

30281.38

Vale of White Horse

27440.61

West Oxfordshire

24070.98

Milton Keynes & Aylesbury Vale Milton Keynes

30221.57

Aylesbury Vale

25624.55



Notes